Vivek's legal notes

 Arre buddhu, mein tera baap hun. Jab tak zinda hun, tab tak tere saath hun,  mein woh hun. Arre buddhu, mein tera baap hun. Jiska khun teri rago mein hai, jo har dum tujhe sheeshe mein nazar aata hai, mein woh hun... Jiski photocopy banke tu nikla hai, jiske naak, kaan, munh aur akal leke tu janma hai, mein woh hun... Jispe tera haq hai, jiska tere pe haq hai,  mein woh hun... Jiski tu jab bhi koi cheej leke jaata hai, mann he mann khil khila utha hai woh, mein woh hun... Jo tere liye 140 crore to kya, 140 hazaar crore se bhi lad jaye, mein woh hun... Jiski har dua yahi kehti hai ki, ke meri umar tujhe lag jaaye, mein woh hun... Puri duniya se bhi upar jo tere liye hai, mein woh hun... tere liye kisi bhagwan se kam nahi hun, mein woh hun... Shayad tera iklauta dost, tera pehla aur aakhri dost,  har dost se pehle wala dost aur har dost ke baad wala dost, mein woh hun... Jisko tu papa ki jagah popa, shopa, chopa, topa , kuch bhi bol le, koi fark nai padta, mein woh hu...

  To, The Hon'ble President of India and The Hon'ble Prime Minister of India, Please fix the procedure of appointment of judges in Supreme Court as these people control the whole judicial organ and significantly impact how the lower judiciary think and work. It is humbly proposed to introduce democratic election procedure for selection of judges among eligible candidates and the voting be done at a wider scale comprising of all litigants (citizen in need of justice), advocates, other judges and other judicial staff. And for these voters to make an informed decision, all the past judgments of a judge may be put in public domain. I understand democratic selection can be unintuitive at times but there is beauty in collective thought process compared to 3-5 selected people (aka collegium system) Regards. Vivek To the citizens of India, Most of you have no idea how much power has been assumed by judges sitting in so called The Supreme Court. These people daily make critical decision...

 This snapshot from a coding practice website to keep oneself updated shows how 3 years got wiped out after a big bang attack in Dec 2020 and ensuing war. Not sure how many more years will this war consume. The God brought this war, so one can only accept it as destiny and fight it.

Supreme Court of India Sunil Gupta And Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors on 2 May, 1990  https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1745823/ Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration , [1980] 3 SCC 526; Bhim Singh, M.L.A.v. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors [1985] 4 S.C.C. 677; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978] 1 SCC 248; Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration , [1978] 4 SCC 494 and Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Administration, [1980] 3 SCC 488 2. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/853252/ Supreme Court of India Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration on 29 April, 1980 Equivalent citations: 1980 AIR 1535, 1980 SCR (3) 855 3.  Supreme Court of India M.P. Dwivedi And Others vs Unknown on 11 January, 1996 Equivalent citations: AIR 1996 SC 2299, 1996 (1) ALD Cri 789, (1997) 1 GLR 39, (1996) 4 SCC 152, 1996 1 SCR 347 Contempt against the judge  B.K. Nigam " It appears that the contemner was completely insensitive about the serious violations of the human rights of t...

 Please see sample filled bail bond form for Delhi at this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHPyzk401C7PI-IQIFOjSQXFKzx5U4OI/view?usp=sharing   This sample form is filled by Mohan to apply for his bail.  " Mohan is the husband of Kamini. His brother Sohan stands as surety for him. Documents to be attached to this form are: 1. Surety identity (aadhar etc) 2. Surety Photo 3. Surety document (FD receipt in original, RC of vehicle etc) " You can buy this form from the stationary shop. It is better to fill this form beforehand, carry your surety and all documents along with you and tell judge to initiate bail process. For bail amount, you can check with the court staff beforehand on general surety amount. It should be 10-15K.  1. Remember, if you are not arrested during investigation, you're entitled to bail as per  Court On Its Own Motion vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 28 January, 2004 Equivalent citations: 109 (2003) DLT 494 https://indiankanoon.org/do...

  1) For Family Courts To, The PIO, Hon'ble Delhi High Court At New Delhi, SUBJECT - Application under section 6(1) and 6(3) of RTI Act 2005   Respected Sir, Following information is requested in reference to Delhi Family Court Rules 1996 (a copy of rules is also available at: https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/sites/default/files/FamilyCourtsRules.pdf for your quick reference) 1. Please provide the list of counsellors attached to each family court in Delhi as per Rule 9 of the mentioned rules. 2. From the list of counsellors in reply to point no. 1, kindly provide the list of counsellors who are also "child counsellors" (i.e. who are qualified to interact and identify issues with children across various age groups, including infants, toddlers, adolescents, and teenagers.) 3. Kindly provide the list of any other child counsellors (along with the court name) who may not be included in the reply to point no. 2 but officially assist the Family courts as child counsellors. 4. ...

 https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/02/17/cognizance-of-criminal-contempt-by-single-judge-of-a-high-court-under-the-contempt-of-courts-act-1971-in-absence-of-any-rules-framed-by-the-high-court-permissibility/ Some of the High Courts including the Delhi High Court have not framed any rules under Section 23 of the Act10 laying down the procedure for taking notice, cognizance, hearing, and determination of the criminal contempt proceedings. In light of Section 18 of the Act, the High Courts in India have taken divergent views on whether a Single Judge of the High Court is barred from taking cognizance of criminal contempt under Section 15 of the Act or not. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/02/17/cognizance-of-criminal-contempt-by-single-judge-of-a-high-court-under-the-contempt-of-courts-act-1971-in-absence-of-any-rules-framed-by-the-high-court-permissibility/   https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193567322/  (Delhi high court finally) Landmark decision on backing out ...