Sec 9 petition

 Following petitions are listed against S 9 HMA

Petition draft: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HhNxY3yUyhgHQDxJkBXUCk3GE3YUNagg/view?usp=drive_link

3W.P.(C) No. 250/2019
PIL-W
OJASWA PATHAK AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIAPRANJAL KISHORE [P-1],[P-2]
CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON,ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1] VISHWA PAL SINGH[INT],PRASHANT PADMANABHAN[INT],FAUZIA SHAKIL[INT]
[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA
IA No. 16731/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
IA No. 46011/2019 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON
IA No. 37957/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
CONNECTED
3.1
W.P.(C) No. 584/2022
PIL-W
CHETNA WELFARE SOCIETY Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1],[R-2]
IA No. 105721/2022 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON
CONNECTED
3.2
W.P.(C) No. 948/2021
PIL-W
MANJARI GUPTA Versus UNION OF INDIAVANSHAJA SHUKLA
IA No.106673/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
IA No. 106673/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT
CONNECTED
3.3
Diary No. 33583-2023
X
JANAKI MAHARANA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.DEVANSH SRIVASTAVA
FOR ADMISSION and IA No.223945/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS
IA No. 223945/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chargesheet Vs final report / A, B, C Summary report

Judgment Analysis : Yashita Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan (with translation in Punjabi)

Ad-interim vs interim orders (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC)