Beware of Pimps in men right groups

Please beware of any advocate references from any fellow members esp. from those members whom you have never met physically. It is no doubt a great human service, second to none, in this litigation business to share reference of local advocates who are fighting your cases well. 

But at the same time, beware of pimps who pushes their advocate with whom they have some vested interest (either free advice in return for new murgas or commission or clerks/assistance/interns of such advocates etc). 

Good people need not get discouraged and stop helping others for the fear of being labelled as pimp. 

To distinguish a pimp from a good person, you can ask for some order of "allegedly good" advocate and based on order sheet/judgment, you can yourself conclude whether advocate is good or bad. It is comparatively easy to understand an advocate or a judge from the order sheets.

If you're just going with blind references esp. from online groups and you have never ever met the other person who is suddenly helping you out of the blue nor have any common acquaintance with such person, have no idea about their case history or which case they are fighting in which court, they themselves are not working with that advocate or do not want to share any of their order sheets or case status, these are some of the red flags and keep in mind that you may be pimped. 

Main coordinators of prominent groups like SIF normally have knowledge of good and bad advocates because they interact with lot of people but they almost never share any advocate references as SIF policy. 

It's a long fight, you will meet lot of demons and sometimes only demons. Fight all of them.

Source: I was pimped once by a guy from Netherlands and it hurt my case by working with that greedy advocate. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chargesheet Vs final report / A, B, C Summary report

Maharashtra police rules as defined in  Bombay Police Manual, 1959, Volume III [referred as The Manual below],   defines two types of police reports which can be submitted to the magistrate by police u/s 173(2) of CrPC. It is the report of police investigation filed at the end of investigation.. a. Charge-sheets (Rule 218 of The Manual) and  b. Final Reports (Rule 219 of Police Manual).  Final report is explained under Rule 219 of The Manual. Rule 219 of The Manual: 219. Final Reports .- (1) When there is no sufficient evidence to justify the forwarding of the accused to a Magistrate, the Police Station Officer or the investigating officer will release the accused person on bail, if he is in custody. (2) The Police Station Officer will then submit a final report to the Magistrate empowered to take cognisance of an offence on a Police report through the Superintendent of Police or the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, as the case may be, in the following three class...
Read more

Judgment Analysis : Yashita Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan (with translation in Punjabi)

Judgment Name : YASHITA SAHU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS  Citation Code :   (2020) 3 SCC 67 Judgment link :  https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/28083/28083_2019_15_1501_19699_Judgement_20-Jan-2020.pdf Court : Supreme Court of India Case Type : CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  127 OF 2020 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 7390 OF 2019) Judge : Hon'ble Justice Sh. Deepak Gupta  (author of judgment) Hon'ble Justice Sh. Aniruddha Bose Summary: This judgment talks about  1) Court treats the child as "human" which is shocking (sarcasm :|) and talks about the human rights of a child to get love and affection from both Parent. It talks about the rights of a parent as well as the rights of a child to get "s ufficient visitation rights" . 2) If any court denies the visitation to a parent, a strong reason should also be assigned and can be justified only unde...
Read more

Ad-interim vs interim orders (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

  Rule 1 or Rule 2 of Order 39 are repository of the power to grant injunction.  An order of injunction is always passed under Rule 1 or Rule 2 Order 39 save and except rare orders passed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.  Rule 1 and Rule 2 of Order 39 do not use the words "interim or ad interim". These are the words coined by the lawyers and the courts merely to indicate the stage at which orders are passed.  Interim order usually remains in force for whole of the period of the suit unless varied under Rule 4 or set aside in appeal.  Ad interim order operates only till the hearing of the application for injunction.  Usually, ad interim order is passed ex parte though it can also be passed when otherwise is present.  It is possible that in a given case at the time of institution of a suit, the plaintiff does not make an application for an order of interim injunction as he feels no necessity in which case only summons of the suit is issu...
Read more