RTI on live streaming proceedings in DHC

 To,

The Public Information Officer,

Department of Justice,

Ministry of Law & Justice,

New Delhi - 110003


SUBJECT - Application under section 6(1) and 6(3) of RTI Act 2005


Respected Sir,


In light of live streaming of proceedings in High Courts of Gujarat, Orissa, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Patna and Madhya Pradesh, kindly provide the following information under RTI Act 2005 with reference to Honble Delhi High Court.


1. Please share the name, phone number, email and designation of the authority responsible for taking decision on live streaming of proceedings of Honble Delhi High Court.


2. Please share details/notes of any meetings or discussions that has happened for deciding live streaming of proceedings of Honble Delhi High Court


3. Please share if any decision is already taken to allow the live streaming or to not allow the live streaming of court proceedings of Delhi high Court. Please share details/copy of any such decision.


4. Please share tentative date by when live streaming of proceedings in Honble High Court of Delhi are expected to start if the decision is already taken in favor of it.


5. If the decision of live streaming of proceedings of Delhi High Court is pending for feedback and suggestion, please share name, designation, address & email of the authority on whom it is pending, the date when it was sent for feedback and the expected date by when the reply is expected and the tentative date when a decision could be made. 


6. Please share reasons for having separate infrastructure for each HC instead of centrally managed infrastructure by single authority who can roll out any updates and improvements to all high courts in one go. Please share contact details of authority responsible for taking decision to have a centrally managed infrastructure for all courts including all district courts, all High Courts and Honble The Supreme Court.


If any of the above information is not related with your office/department, then please forward this request/application to the concerned office/department under section 6(3) of RTI Act 2005 and also please CC to me.


Yours Faithfully,

=========================

FA

To,

The Appellate Authority i.e. Registrar (IT), 

Second Floor, Administrative Block,

Delhi High Court, New Delhi


SUBJECT: Appeal under S. 19 of RTI Act against RTI application with Diary No. 1058/2022 due to incomplete/missing information supplied


Respected Sir, 


I am not satisfied with the reply against information sought in Q. No. 1, 2 and 5.


Q. No. 1. Please share the name, phone number, email and designation of the authority responsible for taking decision on live streaming of proceedings of Honble Delhi High Court. 


Grounds:

No information is supplied for this. Please provide case number/diary number if the matter is pending before the court as public interest is involved in this.



Q. No. 2. Please share details and notes of any meetings or discussions that has happened for deciding live streaming of proceedings of Honble Delhi High Court 


Grounds:

No information is supplied for this. Please provide case number/diary number if the matter is pending before the court so that details of proceedings can be accessed.


Q. No. 5. If the decision of live streaming of proceedings of Delhi High Court is pending for feedback and suggestion, please share name, designation, address, email of the authority on whom it is pending, the date when it was sent for feedback and the expected date by when the reply is expected and the tentative date when a decision could be made. 


Grounds:

No information is supplied for this. Please provide case number/diary number if the matter is pending before the court so that filing date, content, NDOH and details of proceedings can be accessed.



Please provide requisite information.


Yours Faithfully,


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chargesheet Vs final report / A, B, C Summary report

Maharashtra police rules as defined in  Bombay Police Manual, 1959, Volume III [referred as The Manual below],   defines two types of police reports which can be submitted to the magistrate by police u/s 173(2) of CrPC. It is the report of police investigation filed at the end of investigation.. a. Charge-sheets (Rule 218 of The Manual) and  b. Final Reports (Rule 219 of Police Manual).  Final report is explained under Rule 219 of The Manual. Rule 219 of The Manual: 219. Final Reports .- (1) When there is no sufficient evidence to justify the forwarding of the accused to a Magistrate, the Police Station Officer or the investigating officer will release the accused person on bail, if he is in custody. (2) The Police Station Officer will then submit a final report to the Magistrate empowered to take cognisance of an offence on a Police report through the Superintendent of Police or the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, as the case may be, in the following three class...
Read more

Judgment Analysis : Yashita Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan (with translation in Punjabi)

Judgment Name : YASHITA SAHU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS  Citation Code :   (2020) 3 SCC 67 Judgment link :  https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/28083/28083_2019_15_1501_19699_Judgement_20-Jan-2020.pdf Court : Supreme Court of India Case Type : CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  127 OF 2020 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 7390 OF 2019) Judge : Hon'ble Justice Sh. Deepak Gupta  (author of judgment) Hon'ble Justice Sh. Aniruddha Bose Summary: This judgment talks about  1) Court treats the child as "human" which is shocking (sarcasm :|) and talks about the human rights of a child to get love and affection from both Parent. It talks about the rights of a parent as well as the rights of a child to get "s ufficient visitation rights" . 2) If any court denies the visitation to a parent, a strong reason should also be assigned and can be justified only unde...
Read more

Ad-interim vs interim orders (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

  Rule 1 or Rule 2 of Order 39 are repository of the power to grant injunction.  An order of injunction is always passed under Rule 1 or Rule 2 Order 39 save and except rare orders passed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.  Rule 1 and Rule 2 of Order 39 do not use the words "interim or ad interim". These are the words coined by the lawyers and the courts merely to indicate the stage at which orders are passed.  Interim order usually remains in force for whole of the period of the suit unless varied under Rule 4 or set aside in appeal.  Ad interim order operates only till the hearing of the application for injunction.  Usually, ad interim order is passed ex parte though it can also be passed when otherwise is present.  It is possible that in a given case at the time of institution of a suit, the plaintiff does not make an application for an order of interim injunction as he feels no necessity in which case only summons of the suit is issu...
Read more