RTI resources

please provide me the point-wise reply of the information sought under RTI Act 2005 of questions below (or in attached file)

RTI on search and seizure

15.1)  Question:   1. What are the legal provisions of law to conduct Police Raid/Search Raid for the Dowry Articles?

2. What Rank of Police Officers are authorized to pass an order for the conduct of Search/Raid for the Dowry Articles during the pendency of the enquiry at the CAW cell?

3. What are the legal provisions under the Indian law to authorize such police officials to pass an order for the police raid for the search of dowry articles?

 

15.2)  Question:   4. Who passed /issued the order for the police raid at appellant’s residence for the search of dowry articles conducted on 30.06.2006?

5. Name Rank and Official address of the concerned police persons consisting police team for search raid of the dowry articles at his residence on 30.06.2006.

6. Whether the approval or order of the court of law is required to pass an order for the execution of police raid for search of dowry articles?

 

15.3)  Question:   7. Whether the police had taken any order from the court of law to conduct a police raid for the search of dowry articles at his residence?

8. Under which provisions of law a search raid for dowry articles can be conducted by Delhi Police without the order of the court of law?

9. What are the legal provisions regarding public witnesses, police witnesses, list of articles, necessary documents etc. at the time of conducting a police raid for the search of the dowry articles?


15.4)  Question:   10. From where the enquiry officer Ms. Jagpal Kaur CAW cell Nanakpura got the order for conducting a police raid for the search of dowry articles?

11. Whether an application, request for the complaint was filed by the complainant for police raid for search of dowry articles at his residence?


Credit to Mr. Bansal. Source 

========================================

RTI for complaint given through email or post

  1. Email sent to so-n-so email ids on so-n-so dates and ask for confirmation - Whether you've received email or not?
  2. what is the time when you received the email
  3. Whether the email is turned into complaint
  4. what was the action taken on the email

==========================================

RTI to court

Please provide Year-wise breakdown of child custody cases filed under following acts for the last 20 years. If data is not available for the last 20 years, please provide for as many years as available.

Guardian & Wards Act 1890 and/or 

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 

OR

Please provide Year-wise breakdown of child custody cases filed under Guardian & Wards Act 1890 for the last 20 years. If data is not available for last 20 years, please provide for as many years as available.


Year wise break of cases in 1. where the petitioner is mother of child

Year wise break of cases in 1. where the petitioner is father of child

Year wise break of cases in 1. where the petitioner is male

Year wise break of cases in 1. where the petitioner is female

Year wise breakdown of cases resolved, cases dismissed,  in in 1. where the petitioner is mother of child

Year wise breakdown where the mother got sole custody 

Year wise breakdown where the father got sole custody 

Year wise breakdown where shared physical custody was given


had custody and father got custody after 

===============================================
TEP RTI by Atur Chatur at https://rticonsultantdelhi.blogspot.com/2016/03/rti-tep-false-or-true.html?m=1
To                                                                                Dated:- 27/12/2016
Public Information Officer
O/o the Hon’ble INCOME TAX OFFICER,
Ward-23(1), Room No. 807, 8th Floor,
E2-Block, Dr. S.P. Mukherjee Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, Minto Road, New Delhi - 110002

Sub:-   Request for information u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act’2005

Respected Sir,

(1)   Kindly supply the information i.e., the expected time period for the completion of enquiry in ANY tax evasion petition prescribed under the law.
NOTE:- In above point I am NOT asking about my RTI’s or Petitions, instead, I am asking what the law says with respect to maximum time period within which enquiry with respect to any tax evasion petition need to be completed.
(2)   Kindly supply the information i.e., the expected time period for the completion of investigation in ANY tax evasion petition prescribed under the law.
NOTE:- In above point I am NOT asking about my RTI’s or Petitions, instead, I am asking what the law says with respect to maximum time period within which investigation with respect to any tax evasion petition need to be completed.
(3)   I sent a Tax Evasion Petition on 14/07/2014 to your esteemed authority regarding Tax Evasion by Sh. (Late) Dr. Wife’s Father FIL Ji , Smt. Wife’s Mother MIL Ji, Mrs. JHOOTHI DEVI Ji, Ms. Wife’s Sister SIL Ji, all residents of AZ-747, Rani Bagh, New Delhi-110034
Kindly provide me information under the RTI Act, 2005 whether the information provided by me on 23/05/2014 has been found to be false or true
NOTE:- On 14/07/2014 I provided information for all those persons as mentioned above so I request that I be provided the reply to this query accordingly u/s 6 & 7 of the RTI Act, 2005.
CITATION:- As per File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635 it was held by CIC that, “The complainant has a right to know whether the information provided by him has been found to be false or true”.(Annexed for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble PIO)

I am sending a Blank Postal Order no. 16F 123432 of Rs. 10 dated 30/10/2016 is attached herewith. Kindly fill the PIO details as it is the duty of PIO to provide reasonable assistance u/s 5 (3) of the RTI act to applicant. The requested information shall be supplied free of charge in case the same could not be supplied within 30 days u/s 7(6) of RTI Act 2005. Please do not club the information to the points even if the information is repeated.
Enclosed:-   (1) File No.CIC/RM/A/2013/000635

====================================
RTI Judgments:

1. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/114357052/  (Income tax authority claimed they are exempted and in appeal, meaning of information was defined and any information that is available to public authority can be obtained through RTI).

http://www.rtifoundationofindia.com/outcome-tep-filed-appellant-was-denied-us-81j-cic

RTI Foundation of India

Outcome of TEP filed by the appellant was denied u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: complainant has a right to know whether the information provided by him has been found to be false or true; disclose the broad outcome of the TEP once investigation is completed 29 Oct, 2013 FACTS 1. Vide RTI dt 25.10.2012 appellant had sought information on 16 points relating to a TEP filed by him dt. 22.8.2012 against Shri Mithlesh Kumar, questioning the source of Rs. 7,00,000/- spent by him on the marriage of daughter.

Read more at: http://www.rtifoundationofindia.com/outcome-tep-filed-appellant-was-denied-us-81j-cic#.Yie6uvlByM0

RTI Foundation of India

====================================

more rti resources: 

1) http://rtitemplatesfor498a.blogspot.com/2010/05/sample-complaint-to-caw-cell-after.html

2) https://sffdelhitrainingsessions.blogspot.com/2015/02/RTI-TEP.html

3) Shonee's template for RTI Link (Template is to give you idea, not to be used as it is)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chargesheet Vs final report / A, B, C Summary report

Maharashtra police rules as defined in  Bombay Police Manual, 1959, Volume III [referred as The Manual below],   defines two types of police reports which can be submitted to the magistrate by police u/s 173(2) of CrPC. It is the report of police investigation filed at the end of investigation.. a. Charge-sheets (Rule 218 of The Manual) and  b. Final Reports (Rule 219 of Police Manual).  Final report is explained under Rule 219 of The Manual. Rule 219 of The Manual: 219. Final Reports .- (1) When there is no sufficient evidence to justify the forwarding of the accused to a Magistrate, the Police Station Officer or the investigating officer will release the accused person on bail, if he is in custody. (2) The Police Station Officer will then submit a final report to the Magistrate empowered to take cognisance of an offence on a Police report through the Superintendent of Police or the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, as the case may be, in the following three class...
Read more

Judgment Analysis : Yashita Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan (with translation in Punjabi)

Judgment Name : YASHITA SAHU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS  Citation Code :   (2020) 3 SCC 67 Judgment link :  https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/28083/28083_2019_15_1501_19699_Judgement_20-Jan-2020.pdf Court : Supreme Court of India Case Type : CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  127 OF 2020 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 7390 OF 2019) Judge : Hon'ble Justice Sh. Deepak Gupta  (author of judgment) Hon'ble Justice Sh. Aniruddha Bose Summary: This judgment talks about  1) Court treats the child as "human" which is shocking (sarcasm :|) and talks about the human rights of a child to get love and affection from both Parent. It talks about the rights of a parent as well as the rights of a child to get "s ufficient visitation rights" . 2) If any court denies the visitation to a parent, a strong reason should also be assigned and can be justified only unde...
Read more

Ad-interim vs interim orders (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

  Rule 1 or Rule 2 of Order 39 are repository of the power to grant injunction.  An order of injunction is always passed under Rule 1 or Rule 2 Order 39 save and except rare orders passed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.  Rule 1 and Rule 2 of Order 39 do not use the words "interim or ad interim". These are the words coined by the lawyers and the courts merely to indicate the stage at which orders are passed.  Interim order usually remains in force for whole of the period of the suit unless varied under Rule 4 or set aside in appeal.  Ad interim order operates only till the hearing of the application for injunction.  Usually, ad interim order is passed ex parte though it can also be passed when otherwise is present.  It is possible that in a given case at the time of institution of a suit, the plaintiff does not make an application for an order of interim injunction as he feels no necessity in which case only summons of the suit is issu...
Read more