Feminist advocates with questionable contribution to Indian laws

Part of my research on origin of Hatred among feminist advocates.


1. Co-founder of Majlis, who has played great part in feminism movement in India and has played prominent roles in drafting of several laws in India.

Personal Biography:

Agnes grew up with her aunt in Mangalore. After she finished schooling she joined her parents, who lived abroad. Her father and aunt died soon after, so she returned to India, got married, moved to Mumbai, and has been there since. Thirteen years and three children into her marriage, Agnes had had enough of her abusive husband and filed for judicial separation because “back then Christian women could not get divorced on the grounds of cruelty" (the Bombay high court struck down that section of the Indian Divorce Act in 1997, in a ruling in favour of one of Agnes’ clients). She then enrolled at the SNDT Open University and graduated in 1980, following that up with a master of law (LLM) degree in 1992 from Bombay University and an MPhil in family law from the National Law School, Bangalore.

The above paragraph is copied verbatim from  [1] below.

My opinion: People who have experienced tragic childhood and extreme trauma in life may have difficulty in presenting a neutral, balanced approach and if such people are put at forefront in "creation of law", the results are going to be catastrophic. And that's what has happened. We are caught in dangerous downward spiraling effect of failed marriages and broken homes and it can consume our whole country and our religion.

2. Malavika Rajkotia

A prominent hi-profile divorce advocate who considers women as holy cows and men as evil, never fails to cry about patriarchy. She lost her husband when she was 36 and has two kids. Ref. [2]
Her articles can be read at : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malavika_Rajkotia , https://www.india-seminar.com/2019/721/721_malavika_rajkotia.htm . 

(I could not find any info. on how she lost her husband but given her inclinations and hatred against men, there's lot of suspicion). The bitterness and hatred against 50% of world's population is astounding. Some of the reviews about her. Read Pt 9 in this on how OP is not given chance to be heard. Is this the ethical standard of these so called high profile advocates?

3. Vandana Shah - a popular mumbai based advocate who claims "thrown out of her husband’s home with the clothes on her back and ₹750 in the bank account. Over the next few years, she fought an extended divorce battle.". Ref [2]

4. Colin Gonslaves

Seems to be a man suffering from incurable superiority of male gender. "There are just two types of case that we will not do, however meritorious they may be: cases of men against women, and cases of employers against their employees. "[3] He was also allegedly supporter of anti-caa riots according to this link [4] and mentee of Datta Samant who allegedly destroyed textile industry in mumbai and rendered several workers unemployed by misguiding them.

References:

[1] https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/qsv7oc2UcMNGyZYgz4tKLI/Freedom-from-abuse--Flavia-Agnes.html

[2] https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/blink/cover/please-mind-the-gap/article6887312.ece

[3] https://justice.org.uk/colin-gonsalves/

[4] https://www.sirfnews.com/colin-gonsalves-received-rs-50-crore-from-european-churches-to-defend-anti-caa-rioters/

Disclaimer: Opinions are like assholes. If you don't like mine, stop smelling it please!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chargesheet Vs final report / A, B, C Summary report

Maharashtra police rules as defined in  Bombay Police Manual, 1959, Volume III [referred as The Manual below],   defines two types of police reports which can be submitted to the magistrate by police u/s 173(2) of CrPC. It is the report of police investigation filed at the end of investigation.. a. Charge-sheets (Rule 218 of The Manual) and  b. Final Reports (Rule 219 of Police Manual).  Final report is explained under Rule 219 of The Manual. Rule 219 of The Manual: 219. Final Reports .- (1) When there is no sufficient evidence to justify the forwarding of the accused to a Magistrate, the Police Station Officer or the investigating officer will release the accused person on bail, if he is in custody. (2) The Police Station Officer will then submit a final report to the Magistrate empowered to take cognisance of an offence on a Police report through the Superintendent of Police or the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, as the case may be, in the following three class...
Read more

Judgment Analysis : Yashita Sahu Vs State of Rajasthan (with translation in Punjabi)

Judgment Name : YASHITA SAHU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS  Citation Code :   (2020) 3 SCC 67 Judgment link :  https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/28083/28083_2019_15_1501_19699_Judgement_20-Jan-2020.pdf Court : Supreme Court of India Case Type : CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  127 OF 2020 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 7390 OF 2019) Judge : Hon'ble Justice Sh. Deepak Gupta  (author of judgment) Hon'ble Justice Sh. Aniruddha Bose Summary: This judgment talks about  1) Court treats the child as "human" which is shocking (sarcasm :|) and talks about the human rights of a child to get love and affection from both Parent. It talks about the rights of a parent as well as the rights of a child to get "s ufficient visitation rights" . 2) If any court denies the visitation to a parent, a strong reason should also be assigned and can be justified only unde...
Read more

Ad-interim vs interim orders (Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC)

  Rule 1 or Rule 2 of Order 39 are repository of the power to grant injunction.  An order of injunction is always passed under Rule 1 or Rule 2 Order 39 save and except rare orders passed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.  Rule 1 and Rule 2 of Order 39 do not use the words "interim or ad interim". These are the words coined by the lawyers and the courts merely to indicate the stage at which orders are passed.  Interim order usually remains in force for whole of the period of the suit unless varied under Rule 4 or set aside in appeal.  Ad interim order operates only till the hearing of the application for injunction.  Usually, ad interim order is passed ex parte though it can also be passed when otherwise is present.  It is possible that in a given case at the time of institution of a suit, the plaintiff does not make an application for an order of interim injunction as he feels no necessity in which case only summons of the suit is issu...
Read more