Vivek's legal notes

In case of application of passport of minor, "full consent" is usually needed. Full consent means the consent of both parents where they need to appear in passport office along with minor. Many countries like Australia allow issuance of passport without full consent only " with an Australian court order".  In India, the noise to paint abductors women as "victim single mothers" by crooked feminist advocates make things murkier with govt. introducing several complex and ambiguous statements which can be misused by unscruplous people. Applicable act: Passport Rules, 1980 Sample judgement from kerala HC where passport officer refused to issue passport without consent of both parents but court overruled it.  https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24791576/ RTI: passport is not private information: https://mynation.net/docs/987-2008/ Important links:  1) https://passportindia.gov.in/AppOnlineProject/rpo/rpoPages/rpoDelhi/delhiRPO.html 2) https://passportindia.gov.in/AppO...

Source: Pages 99-100 in https://doj.gov.in/sites/default/files/ASCI%20Final%20Report%20Page%20641%20to%20822.pdf

 Judgment link: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122489083/ Allegation:  the appellant has fabricated a Power of Attorney dated 19 December 2011 by forging the signature of his brother. Nothing proved. Brother not complained. It's just one allegation among mountains of allegations and many court cases from both sides, yet the appellant had to go to SC to seek permission to travel for 8 weeks to US to save his green card. FIR under  under  Sections 420 ,  467 ,  468 ,  469 ,  470 ,  471  and  474  of the Indian Penal Code 1860 read with the provisions of  Section 34 . The appellant lives in US for last 35 years with whole extended family and is a green card holder and some property dispute with some crazy person in India and the ugly dance of advocate-money-muscle power. Courts trying to stop him from going to US so that his green card gets cancelled and he has to rot in this sh*tty country. Ironical! Finally, after much effort...

A bad MRA will: 1. Ask you lot of personal questions like name of company where you work, how much you earn.  2. Never tell the name of his advocate, sometimes not even his own real name, job etc. He can be a telegram ninja with disappearing chats and hidden phone and name, his shadow also may not know him. 3. Will give you generic gyan like never file divorce, always file divorce, take back rcr, file rcr, DV will kill you, 125 will kill you, no judge will listen to you, 90% advocates are stupid etc. You will never understand the real meaning of any of these statements. It's a secret knowledge held by this mra. 4. Ignore you and never reply you. Even if you write to them that you are dying, they will ignore you while claiming to be topmost mra in their groups. 5. Will ask you what you have done for him and his group and why he should help you but will never help you beyond Pt 3. 6. Is a twitter fan. His idea of conquering this world is to tweet and retweet. He wants you to be an ag...

https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/aatmanirbhar-bharat-ola-futurefactory-to-be-run-entirely-by-women-says-ceo-bhavish-aggarwal-11631515496879.html

  The Family Courts came to be established under the 1984 Act.   Section 7   specifies the jurisdiction of the Family Court and   about the nature of claims to be adjudicated by it in the form of suits and proceedings delineated in the explanation in sub­ section (1).   Section 10   predicates about the procedure generally. The provisions of the CPC are made applicable for resolution of disputes falling under the 1984 Act. The Family Court is deemed to be a Civil Court having all powers of such Court. Consequent to bestowing such power on the Family Court, comes with it a primary duty to make efforts for settlement, as prescribed under   Section 9 . If that does not happen, during the resolution of disputes between the parties, the Family Court then has to bear in mind the principles enunciated in the   Indian Evidence Act , 1872, which had been made applicable in terms of   Section 14   of the 1984 Act. A Family Court can receive as ev...

    Section 7  of the 1890 Act bestows power in the Court to make order as to guardianship in respect of a minor. Such prayer can be made by anyone interested in the welfare of the minor and “not limited to the father and mother of the minor”. In this inquiry, the Court, if so satisfied that it is for the welfare of the minor, is free to appoint the applicant as a guardian of person or property of the minor or both or merely declaring a person to be such a guardian.  Section 8  of the Act makes it amply clear as to who is entitled to apply for the order. It has specified four categories of persons. First is person desirous of being the guardian of the minor. The second is any relative or friend of the minor. The third is the Collector of the district or other local area within which the minor ordinarily resides and the fourth is the Collector having authority with respect to the class to which the minor belongs. Such application is required to be filed before th...